Howard: Government funded faith healing neglects Constitutional restrictions

| | More

published: Wed, 4 Nov, 2009

Believe it. There’s a version of the Senate health care bill that would elevate faith healing to the level of clinical medicine, the Los Angeles Times reported. The provision, inserted by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, with the support of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass, and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass, is designed to reimburse individuals for Christian Science prayer treatments.

Based in Massachusetts, the Church of Christ, Scientist is a Christian denomination that eschews clinical medicine in favor of faith healing and specifically encourages the use of prayer to heal people. They charge between $20 and $50 per day for this prayer, and it is this charge that the Senate provision would reimburse.

This bi-partisan Senate provision is emblematic of the dangers of government involvement in health care. If the provision survives consolidation with the House bill, the U.S. government would recognize and pay for prayer as medicine.

Christian Science is a religion whose adherents deny their children medical care for chronic illnesses and life-threatening diseases. Certainly, these individuals are constitutionally free to practice their special brand of theological quackery, but denying children medical care and to risk sending them to early graves as a result should simply be criminal.

Or at least it was criminal until the 1970s and ’80s, when Christian Scientists successfully lobbied legislatures in 45 states to enact laws that protect parents who practice faith healing from prosecution for child abuse or neglect if they deny their children medical care, the The Wall Street Journal reported.
Children denied medical attention according to the tenets of Christian Science have died from diabetes, appendicitis, diphtheria, measles and many other preventable and treatable illnesses. Now, three senators would fund this theology and recognize it as medicine.

There is no absolute account of how many children have died as a result of Christian Science neglect, but a 1998 study in the journal Pediatrics reported that 172 children whose parents withheld medical treatment from them for religious reasons died between 1975 and 1995. Of these deaths, “140 fatalities were from conditions for which survival rates with medical care would have exceeded 90 percent” and only 43 of the 172 reported deaths were ever prosecuted.

Because Christian Scientists rarely report their children’s illness to doctors, hospitals or other authorities, these 172 documented deaths have to be understood as only a fraction of the number of children who have died as a result of not receiving medical treatment for religious reasons.
Not content to simply see state laws enacted that protect negligent parents from prosecution, lobbyists for the Church of Christ, Scientist approached universal health care laws as a way to further legitimize this theology and even have it funded by the state.

When Massachusetts enacted a statewide universal health care program in 2006, Christian Scientists successfully lobbied to include a provision in the bill that allowed people to opt-out of the plan for religious reasons. The Church lobbyists then secured reimbursements for faith healing similar to the provision in the current Senate bill.

As a result, taxes in the state of Massachusetts are used to pay for faith healing and other “medical” programs offered by Christian Scientists.
Although the developments in Massachusetts are troubling, the implications of such provisions being applied at the federal level could be disastrous.
First, the expenditure of federal tax dollars on religious services constitutes a clear breach of the Constitution’s Establishment Clause and the very spirit of the doctrine of separation of church and state. These Constitutional concerns effectively scuttled the Christian Science provisions in the House health care bill and currently represent the most effective argument to defeat similar provisions in the Senate.

Second, if the provision remains in the bill and the bill is passed, faith healing would be federally elevated to the level of clinical medicine. This could grant Christian Scientists and other similar sects greater legal legitimacy and give them a stronger legal claim to control their children’s medical care in the case of a life-threatening illness.

This provision in the Senate health bill is an example of just how dangerous government involvement can be in health care when fringe interest groups are able to exert sufficient pressure on legislators in order to have their quackery recognized as medicine and funded by the state.

Continue the conversation at Giles’s blog, http://www.gilesbhoward.com/blog/, or e-mail Giles at gbh4@pitt.edu.

Comments

Why the Senate provision is fair

I am a practicing Christian Scientist and my family has successfully relied on spiritual healing for five generations now. My intent in posting this comment is not to “pitch” my preferred system of healing to those who depend on other types of health care, but to explain why I feel it is important that there be a provision for spiritual healing in any forthcoming healthcare legislation.

It would seem fundamentally unfair for someone to be required to pay for insurance that does not cover the type of healthcare he or she utilizes. In a policy climate where some form of mandated universal coverage appears likely, it would only seem fair that anyone required to pay into a system would have coverage for the type of health care that they have found works best for them (without depriving anyone else of their choices). If the individual mandate to buy insurance does not provide for those who rely on qualifying spiritual care, they may receive no benefit for their premiums.

While Christian Scientists normally choose a path other than conventional medicine, this choice is not based on blind faith. It instead reflects a systematic approach to prayer that has proven to be reliable and effective in the lives of those who practice it. Most Christian Scientists would agree that when praying about a health issue (especially for a child) RESULTS MATTER. Christian Scientists don’t believe or teach that their religion somehow exempts them from the legal and moral obligations that every parent has to provide the best possible care for their children. Indeed, I believe that most Christian Scientists feel a heightened sense of this responsibility and consistently practice their faith within that context.

I appreciate this opportunity to provide a different perspective on this issue. Anyone interested in learning more about Christian Science healing may wish to check out the website www.ChristianScience.com.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human? (we've been getting a lot of spam lately...)
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

RECENT VIDEOS

SGB showdown: Romeo vs. Shull


published: Wed, 18 Nov, 2009

The Pitt News interviews SGB presidential candidates Justin Romeo and Charlie Shull.


'Dracula' at Pitt


published: Thu, 29 Oct, 2009

Pitt Rep's 2009-10 season kicks off with Ted Tiller's "Count Dracula," which will run from Oct. 22 through Nov. 1 in Charity Randall Theatre.




Centennial Celebration