Pitt students seek counseling after G-20 disturbances

| More

published: Wed, 7 Oct, 2009

Some students have begun visiting the University’s Counseling Center for help coping with the aftermath of Oakland’s G-20 demonstrations.

While the center doesn’t expect “a stampede” of students, it’s possible more people will begin to seek counseling, said James Cox, director of the University Counseling Center.

According to a virtual pamphlet on the Counseling Center’s website, students might experience strong feelings of shock, fear, helplessness and guilt after disturbances like last month’s G-20 demonstrations. Some might struggle to sleep because of nightmares or other disturbing dreams. Others might experience strong reactions to things that remind them of the event.

“We’re not being flooded with students,” Cox said. “But this thing might not happen right away.”

Cox said he couldn’t predict when students might experience those emotions.

“Outcomes would vary depending on the individual,” he said. “I can’t give you specifics. I can’t tell you specifically when it might happen or what the outcomes may be. It’s not a cookie-cutter thing.”

The Counseling Center hosted an event in the Union’s lower lounge last night to advise students on how to cope with traumatic events. Cox said the event was anticipatory.

“This is being done on a preventative basis, not a reactionary one,” he said.

Cox said that while some students had visited the Counseling Center since the G-20, they were not anticipating a large crowd.

“We came up with this idea to make sure everyone knows about our services and can utilize our services,” he said. “Symptoms often reveal themselves over time.”

Pitt student Tracey Hickey was arrested for failure to disperse during a G-20 demonstration. She said she’d been holding the door to Towers Lobby open shortly before she was arrested, hoping to help people disperse.

Hickey said she felt anxious and had trouble sleeping in the immediate aftermath of the demonstrations.

“It was a very stressful time, there was lots of uncertainty,” Hickey said. “I heard that I would be facing everything from expulsion to having my charges dropped.”

Hickey said she’s feeling better now, largely because she got support from her parents and fellow students.

Hickey did not seek counseling and said she does not plan to in the future. She said she is not aware of what aid the counseling center is offering to students.

“I haven’t seen anything, aside from them handing out their phone numbers,” Hickey said. Cox said the center has been advertising in The Pitt News.

The overall experience left Hickey with distrust for the police.

“I wouldn’t say that I’m going to hate the police from now on, but I now know they might not always be there to help us,” Hickey said. “Now if I see riot gear, I’m going to want to run in the other direction.”

City police spokeswoman Diane Richard said in an e-mail, “I have no statement in regard to how an individual should feel. They are entitled to their feelings. However, the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police will continue to serve and protect the citizens of the City of Pittsburgh.”

She added, “If an officer is in riot gear, there would obviously be a situation that warranted the activity for which he/she is dressed. Riot gear is meant to repel a crowd, not to draw one.

Comments

Police Spokesperson Comments Disappointing

City police spokeswoman Diane Richard reportedly said in an e-mail, "If an officer is in riot gear, there would obviously be a situation that warranted the activity for which he/she is dressed. Riot gear is meant to repel a crowd, not to draw one."

This is a disappointing comment. She says that, in essence, if police are in riot gear there must be riot conditions. If we are to continue along the same lines, we might falsely conclude that if students were arrested they must have been doing something wrong. However, we know that some students who were arrested were just trying to help out, or just caught trying to go from one building to another on their own campus, or just young and curious as future leaders are prone to be.

Richard says 'students are entitled to their own feelings'---with absolutely zero validation of those feelings.

My position is that, any student who purposefully damaged property or tried to harm a police officer, or anyone else, should face disciplinary action. I have no use for anyone who brings harm to others, or tries to tear down what others have built up. However, students arrested for "failure to disperse" should be fully exonerated. If Pittsburgh continues to press charges or exact money or community service from these students, Pittsburgh will be in a state of disgrace, similar to Durham's disgrace when they pressed charged against rowdy college students after they had probable cause to believe they were innocent.

My only concern here is for Pittsburgh and the University of Pitt, to do the honorable thing and act to protect and exonerate all students who did not cause harm (who were not known to damage property or assault police). Any other response will haunt Pittsburgh for years to come. Any other response would be filthy and utterly self-serving, actually. I personally will publicize weak responses by the city of Pittsburgh and the Police, and ensure that injustices against our college students are not papered over. This is because I care about our young people and don't want the lesson they take from this to be: 'keep your head down, never take a stand, don't get involved in the issues of your day, or you'll be flattened.' I want them to see that it's o.k. to see what's wrong in society and try to fix it. I want them to believe that they can change things for the better.

IF Pittsburgh and the University handle these issues gracefully, and are supportive of students in the aftermath of G20, then we need to forgive and move on. Stuff happens in tense situations and we must appreciate that the police put their lives on the line for us, daily. I want to support the Police and Pitt's administration, but they must do the right thing at critical junctures such as this one. Reportedly, Pitt's police tried to protect Pitt students.


every comment from a public official has been disgusting

the police spokeswoman is, shockingly, FOS. the police did not act to protect the people of PGH, but rather to insulate a narrow sliver of elites from them.

warring factions in the streets would warrant that kind of police presence. what happened on the nights of 9/24 and 9/25--people milling around, a few broken windows--certainly did not.

frankly, the lack of militancy on the part of the vast majority of pitt students in the aftermath of an unconscionable assault on their rights is appalling. they have the rest of their lives to be gutless suburbanites.


well said McCoy If the

well said McCoy

If the police, public officials, and college administration, made this brutal repression possible....how is complaining to them going to solve anything? We need to RESIST


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


CAPTCHA
Are you human? (we've been getting a lot of spam lately...)
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

Right Sidebar

MULTIMEDIA

Having an awesome spring break


published: Thu, 4 Mar, 2010

Students share why their spring break will be awesome — or not so awesome.


Mysteries in a chemistry lab


published: Mon, 1 Mar, 2010

Go on a virtual tour of a chemistry lab and find out why everyone might start talking about metal-organic frameworks in the near future.





Centennial Celebration